Morally Justification Of The Civil Disobedience - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 2 Words: 552 Downloads: 4 Date added: 2019/05/15 Category Society Essay Level High school Tags: Civil Disobedience Essay Did you like this example? I negate the resolution that civil disobedience in a democracy is morally justified. in order to formulate this round, I give these definitions, according to Merriam-Webster.com civil disobedience means to refusal to obey governmental demands or commands especially as a nonviolent and usually collective means of forcing concessions from the government. democracy means government by the people especially rule of the majority. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Morally Justification Of The Civil Disobedience" essay for you Create order And morally justified means acting in accord with divine or moral law and the central issue, my value for this debate is morality. My value criterion is maximizing honesty and loyalty which assists the government and the people to stay protected. My contentions are its immoral to defy any law, civil disobedience leads to rioting with the state, civil disobedience can hurt the government during war time My first contention to negate this resolution, its immoral to defy any law. According to debate.org Law are put in place to maintain order for instance Laws are brought in place to assure the liberties of the people or citizens, as well as sustain order and bypass conflict between societies. Laws serve as the benchmark of policy to the citizens, they also provide Protocall as to what is accepted in communities. Without laws there would be major destruction corruptions so should not defy the law because if its wrong to break the law you should not perform civil disobedience because youre also breaking the law My second contention to negate this resolution Civil disobedience can lead to rioting with the state. As claimed by the website debate.org it states, Civil disobedience can rapidly turn into a terrible Mob and fighting can occur because of, money, or social tension. for example, conflict with the police force would damage the relationship between the government and the citizens which would motivate the citizens to not trust and rely on the government. He nce, the state will start to fall apart since people do not trust it. Therefore, civil disobedience in a democracy should not be morally justified to avoid conflict rioting and violence My third contention to negate this resolution civil disobedience can hurt the government durig war time derives from the fact that CD during war time can divert and disturb the government and can decrease loyalty against the government along conflict and wartime, where the troops and armies need full support from their country or nation and the people will try to trick the government due to the fact that the government will already be distracted due to the war the citizens can easily make the gov listen to them and fix the act or law knowing he has a lot on his plate and making it even worse and after the war of as time passes the gov can realize the he made a mistake and may be too late to repeal the law or the other branches may or may not agree with him In conclusion I stated the civil disobedience in democracy is not morally justified and my contentions to support t his fact are its immoral to defy any law, civil disobedience leads to rioting with the state, civil disobedience can hurt the government during war time my value for this round was morality to set standards by society and people for evaluating the rightness and wrongness of acts.

The Urban Renewal Project Of Paris, Caillebotte Painted...

During the time of the urban renewal project of the Haussmannisation in Paris, Caillebotte painted Paris Street; Rainy Day (Fig. 1). Depicting little to no amount of communication and physical contact between the various figures walking through the intersection, this significantly unique painting provides a sense of isolation and detachment. Caillebotte utilises several techniques in order to construct a powerful two-point perspective in his painting. By determining where the lines of the objects in the painting recede towards and eventually meet along the horizon, the vanishing points can be located. As the illusion of a three-dimensional space is recreated onto a picture plane on a two-dimensional surface, the vanishing points are†¦show more content†¦The smaller the figures are, the further away they are portrayed. Furthermore, when the parallel lines of an object on a picture plane extend toward a single point, the object will appear as though it is further away. Thus, these lines will eventually converge and disappear at a point in the implied distance. This is known as the vanishing point. Objects on a picture plane can appear larger or smaller, depending on the distance from the viewer. For instance, in Paris Street; Rainy Day, the architecture towering over the horizon provides a significant indication of where the vanishing points are situated. The lines representing the roof, mouldings, windows and balconies on the faà §ade of the building in the middle left of the painting recede diagonally towards the horizon. If these lines visibly extended further, they would converge at two points on either side of the building along the horizon. More specifically, these vanishing points would be located by the umbrella on the left and just to the right of the lamp post along the horizon. Whether there are one, two, or three, vanishing points enable one to recreate a perceived point of view with form and depth in space. Perspective is a fundamental component of producing realistic landscapes, still-lifes, portraits, etc. As demonstrated through the exploration of the perspective in

No Work, No Food Essay Example For Students

No Work, No Food Essay No Work, No Food 83Hyakujo, the Chinese Zen master, used to labor with his pupils even at the age of eighty, trimming the gardens, cleaning the grounds, and pruning the trees. The pupils felt sorry to see the old teacher working so hard, but they knew he would not listen to their advice to stop, so they hid away his tools. That day the master did not eat. The next day he did not eat, nor the next. He may be angry because we have hidden his tools, the pupils surmised. We had better put them back. The day they did, the teacher worked and ate the same as before. In the evening he instructed them: No work, no food. In life, people take many things for granted, whether it is how we play with our children, or what kind of job we do, or just simply having fun. For the older generation, taking things for granted wasnt an option. In this simple passage, trying to convince someone to take it easy proved to be a very valuable lesson for some youngsters. When life gets to ruff, normally we tend to slow down a bit. Often the younger generation, healthy and strong, perceives that the older generation should take it easier than normal. However, in China, the Chinese Zen master doesnt seem to fit this scenario. They seem to carry the philosophy that each carries their own weight no matter what the consequence. The younger pupils felt the Master was working extremely to hard and knew that he would not to a break. Having this information, they concocted a plan to hide his work tools so he would have no choice but to take a break. As the day slowly elapsed into darkness, they realized the Zen master hadnt eaten. This carried into the 3rd day and finally the pupils felt he was angry so they returned them to their original place and that evening, they noticed the master eating again. Afterwards, he instructed the pupils No Work, No Food. The morale of the story is never take life for granted. In order for each of us to make it in this world, we must be willing to carry our own weight and not allow anyone to do our share of the work. Life isnt a free ride and shouldnt be considered one either.

Conformity and Individuality free essay sample

What have the students of Gordon high school learned about individuality and conformity? How has Rhue conveyed their experiences to the responder? In the book â€Å"The wave†, Morton Rhue conveys his idea of the conformity through the introduction of the organization called â€Å"the wave† and its impact upon students in Gordon High. At the same time, his opinions towards individuality are expressed through the personal experience and the behavior of the non-wave members. Conformity is not just a simple inclination to the majority. To take it further, conformity is actually a kind of â€Å"symptom† when a person gradually loses his control over himself. In other words, conformity is a compromise to the community in exchange for the recognition from the public by giving up own ideas and thoughts. In addition, people who conform together would feel superior compared to others who are not parts of them. That’s why the fascism towards a particular thing spreads faster and faster. Through the motto, Strength through discipline, Morton Rhue shows the idea of brainwashing, the essential process which creates conformity among a group. Motto is a phrase that shows a broad and shared vision of the group. In fact, motto is the most effective instrument of doctrinisation. It is required to brainwash members of a group in order to clear their concerns and help to establish loyalty towards the group. The commission to the motto shows a person’s determination to the ideology conveyed by the group. When students in the histroy chanted, the repetition of â€Å"Strength through discipline† made them believe that they had actually become stronger than before and meanwhile they felt excited and powerful because everyones identical reaction created sense of unity in the class. Morton Ruhe also expresses the fear brought by The wave through the anonymous letter in chapter 11. The fear towards The wave is directly reflected by the anonymity of the letter. The reason why it is anonymous is that the boy who writes the letter is afraid of being accused of his resistane to the group. The fact that the letter could have been written by a junior student shows the impact of the wave has extended beyond the initial group but to almost the whole school. The content of the letter, â€Å"He even said I would lose all my friends if I don’t join. I think he was trying to scare me†, reveals the fact that some of those new members are attracted by â€Å"the wave† itself while most are persuaded by their friends or even forced to attend the party-like event. This emphasizes the fear caused by The wave. As the power of â€Å"the wave† increases, students’ fear and concerns upon it increases as well. Only by conforming to the group, can they be free from the discrimination and accepted by the majority and this makes the expansion of The wave faster and more uncontrollable. In addition, through the incidence of bully happened to a jewish boy, Morton Rhue communicates the sense of superiority and absolute power across the group. Though the fact was not clear, it was noted that after thoses lads were separated by teachers, those beaters gave a salute of Wave. Just as Mr. Saunders said, There was even some uncertainty over whether it was over The Wave, or whether The Wave was just an excuse the hoods had used to start a fight†, The wave might have become an excuse for violence becasue they thought there were superior and hence eligible to bully others. The fact that no one stood out to help that jewish boy shows the power of the wave is immutable and has taken over the justice in the school. In contrast, individuality occurs when a person stays different from the majority. Individuals, or dissenters, who hold different ideas are always treated as so-called â€Å"nerds† and become marginalized. By referring to the personal experience of Laurie, Morton Rhue illustrates the idea of individuality from different aspects. By showing the disruption of the school caused by wave, Morton Rhue conveys the idea that individuality is fragile compared to conformity. At first, only a few are wave members, however, it got more and more people into the system. It is because individuality is harder to hold. Being the one who stands against the wave means you have to incur wrath and despise from others. Therefore, it requires extremely stubbornness in mind to bear and resist the external peer pressure. Morton Rhue also expresses that the awareness of individuality can be achieved through effective communication. The talk between Laurie and her mother induced Lauries concern over the wave and she successfully overcome the pressure with the support from her family. Effective communication and backing are very important in terms of the maintenance of individuality. Furthermore, Morton Rhue emphasizes the importance of individuality by comparing Laurie to the others. Determination and persistence of Laurie proved that she was right at the end. This shows that individuality is vital for a group to be instructed towards a positive direction. In conclusion, conformity and individuality are two completely different characteristics of people. Conformity is more influential while individuality is fragile. There is not absolute right or wrong between conformity and individuality. People would conform because they will be fairly treated and accepted by the majority when they acknowledged to the same belief. At the meantime, people would dissent from the community because they strongly believe in themselves and hold ideas which actually would help to improve the community in action. Neither of conformity and individuality can be justified but they need to be balanced in order to achieve a stable society. Conformity is required regarding to the ethical rules and laws in the world. Yet individuality is also needed as it is important that people have their own ideas and behavior in terms of self-conviction.